AniPoint Site Research

Finding a location is easy.
Finding the right location is a science.

Car wash · QSR · Gas · C-store · Drive-thru · Brokers · Automotive Services · Franchise developers

Coverage U.S. nationwide Turnaround Days, not weeks Report Fixed fee

A research-based lens on every site decision

I. Our Perspective

Site decisions involve traffic, customers, competition, and demand - each a research question. We bring primary-source data, modeled scenarios, and a documented methodology to those questions, alongside operator judgment.

Evidence behind every input

Traffic, demographics, and competitor density are research questions with verified, citable answers from federal and commercial sources - the kind of inputs that hold up to a lender or partner.

Modeled scenarios at capital scale

A new site is a $300K–$1.5M commitment. Base, bull, and bear revenue projections give that capital a documented analytical base alongside operator pro-formas.

Distinguishing similar candidates

Two candidate tracts can look identical on a map. Demand capture, customer fit, and competitive density modeling surface the differences that matter before lease or build.

What our analysis delivers

II. Coverage

Six analytical workstreams built on primary-source data, market research, and standardized evaluation criteria.

01

Location Ranking

Census tracts evaluated across traffic volume, demographic fit, and competitive density to identify the strongest opportunities.

02

Customer Profile Analysis

Assessment of trade area demographics and their alignment with the operator's target customer base.

03

Traffic & Demand Analysis

Federal traffic counts supplemented with local demand indicators to evaluate customer activity and site exposure.

04

Revenue Projections

Base, upside, and downside scenarios developed from operating assumptions and estimated market demand.

05

Risk Assessment

Evaluation of key performance risks and factors that may influence first-year outcomes.

06

Competitive Mapping

Geographic analysis of competitor locations and their overlap with the candidate trade area.

What's at stake in a site selection decision

III. Economic Case

A relatively small research investment helps inform a capital decision that may involve hundreds of thousands of dollars in deployment risk.

Capital Investment
$0–$0
Typical car wash development cost
Research Investment
$0–$0
Three report tiers, fixed fee
Potential Loss Avoidance
$0
If a non-viable site is screened out
Case Study A - Site Comparison

Similar surface characteristics can conceal materially different market fundamentals

Two trade areas appear comparable at first glance: both located on active commercial corridors and both presenting apparent demand. Our analysis found: Area A records approximately 18,000 vehicles per day, exhibits positive population growth, and faces lower competitive density. Area B records roughly 6,000 vehicles per day, has declining population trends, and contains three competing washes within a two-mile radius.

Projected outcome: Area A supports an estimated annual revenue potential exceeding $400K, while Area B does not meet break-even thresholds under comparable operating assumptions. A $4,500 Standard report helps identify this distinction before capital is committed.

Case Study B - Multi-Market Evaluation

Comparative market analysis prior to development

A franchise developer is evaluating three prospective markets representing approximately $1.8M in planned capital deployment. On preliminary review, all three markets appear similar. A Tier 3 analysis identified meaningful differences: Markets A and B demonstrated strong indicators of first-year viability, while Market C showed weaker traffic fundamentals and increased competitive pressure from planned entrants.

Result: Capital is allocated to the stronger opportunities while the weaker market is deferred for further review. The analysis reduces uncertainty, improves resource allocation, and provides additional support for lender and investor discussions.

Three tiers, one framework

IV. Reports

Pick the depth that fits the decision. Every report is fixed-fee with a defined deliverable.

Tier 1
Standard
$0
 
Single market. Revenue projections. Walkthrough call.
  • Ranked map of viable tracts (at group block level)
  • Revenue projections (base / bull / bear)
  • Full competitor map, scored by site
  • Traffic viability map
  • Investment-outlook callout
  • 30-min walkthrough + two revisions
Contact
Tier 2
Premium
$0
+ $3,500 per additional market, up to 2
Full risk modeling. 30 days Q&A
  • Everything in Standard
  • Probability of loss, downside, upside
  • Risk-ranked tract recommendations
  • Custom revenue model
  • 60-min walkthrough + 30 days Q&A
Contact
Tier 3
Portfolio
$0
$4.9K per market; Non-portfolio: $47.5K
Five markets. 60 days support.
  • Everything in Premium
  • 5 markets on one scoring framework
  • Side-by-side market comparison
  • Investment memo for capital partners
  • 90-min working session + 60 days support
Contact

From brief to verdict in days

V. Process
Step 01

Scope

Target geography, capital available, decision criteria, and what matters most.

Step 02

Assemble

Traffic counts, demographic tracts, and competitor inventory from primary sources.

Step 03

Score

Rank tracts, project revenue, and run downside probabilities under documented weights.

Step 04

Deliver

Annotated maps, written report, and a clear go / no-go recommendation.

Primary sources, documented inputs

VI. Data Sources

Every input is authoritative and traceable. No third-party guesstimates layered on each other.

Source What it covers
Federal Highway Data Daily traffic counts at the road-segment level
U.S. Census · ACS Tract-level population, income, age, and education
BEA / BLS Series County-level economic growth and labor signals
County Business Patterns Establishment counts by industry, for competitive density
Live places API Operating competitor locations and trade-area overlap (live)
CPI series Purchasing-power adjustments on revenue projections

Who's behind AniPoint

VII. About Us
Robed Beauvile-Owen
Founder & Principal · PhD, Mathematics

I founded AniPoint to bring a more structured, data-driven approach to site selection. Our research combines demographic analysis, traffic data, competitive intelligence, and geospatial methods to help operators evaluate locations before capital is committed.

Connect on LinkedIn →

PhD · Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh
5+ yrs · Senior Data Scientist and ML/AI Engineer
GIS · Geospatial Analysis and Production Mapping Systems

Need location screening, scoring, or market analysis?

Share the geography, target use case, or candidate sites, and we'll recommend an appropriate research scope.